Titanic Failures
It
 is our strong recommendation that organization do not make changes to 
their quality management systems until the formal standard is released 
in 2015.
| White Star Line: Titanic | 
The
 story of the Titanic is amazing and great movie. So many things could 
and do go wrong and have such cataclysmic effects. When you look deeply 
into the story and history of the Titanic, the question surfaces, "What 
were they thinking?" Here are just a few of the things that went wrong 
some you may know, some you may find quite prophetic as you and your 
organization plan for the ISO 9001:2015 transition.
-Only 20 lifeboats.
-Compliant with code for a 10,000 ton ship, there was no documented code for a ship of 46,000 tons like the Titanic.
-There was only 6 - 7 hours of testing and never at any testing at top speed for maneuvering.
-Life safety training only involved lowering two life boats, giving an inaccurate time of evacuation.
-Binoculars and Searchlights were in short supply.
-State of the art Marconi wireless telegraph system had just a few people trained to operate and/or receive messages.
-There
 was a fire in the coal bunker that started just prior to the voyage and
 took several days to extinguish. It is believed the fire may have 
weakened part of the ship's hull, which aided in the sinking. 
-Four cautionary warnings of ice were received between one to six hours prior to the collision.
So why all the statistics and the history lesson? It's in the history that we learn what mistakes not to make. 
The
 ISO 9001:2015 standard has gone to great lengths to encourage an 
organization to take a long hard look at what the risks and 
opportunities are and then to proactively respond to them. Section 6 of 
the ISO standard ties all risk and opportunity assessments together into
 the planning process for mitigation or continual improvement. We can no
 longer only look within our organization for threats and opportunities 
for advancement; we must also look at the empirical data that surrounds 
our context for avenues of success. 
 The
 very first requirement of section 6, requires organizations to include 
issues (Risks and Opportunities) identified in 4.1, understanding the 
organization and its context and 4.2 needs and expectations, or 
interested parties in their quality management system planning. If you 
had been on the board of directors for the White Star Line, the creators
 of the Titanic, what would have gone into your planning process?
The
 very first requirement of section 6, requires organizations to include 
issues (Risks and Opportunities) identified in 4.1, understanding the 
organization and its context and 4.2 needs and expectations, or 
interested parties in their quality management system planning. If you 
had been on the board of directors for the White Star Line, the creators
 of the Titanic, what would have gone into your planning process?
6.1.1
 a) Would 6-7 hours of testing at partial speed given you the assurance 
that your organization could achieve its intended results? The assurance
 the ship would safely arrive?
6.1.1
 b) Would 20 lifeboats although very much compliant with the "Codes and 
Standards" of the day, met your criteria to prevent, or reduce, 
undesired effects? 
6.1.1 c) Would the revolutionary Marconi wireless telegraph system have shown evidence of achieving continual improvement? 
What
 would you and your organization have done differently, given the 
opportunity? What would your strategic plan for success have addressed?
6.1.2
 a) Would you have taken actions to address these risks and 
opportunities, maybe purchased a few more binoculars and search lights?
6.1.2 b) Would you have delayed the launch to integrate, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the lifesaving protocols?
Any
 one singular action take to address the known risks would have either 
decreased the number of lives lost or could have potentially prevented 
the collision with the iceberg altogether. Section 6.1 closes out the 
section on Quality Management System Planning with a wonderfully freeing
 statement. "Actions taken to address risk and opportunities shall be 
proportionate to the potential impact on the conformity of products and 
service". 
 You
 may feel your organization is just waiting for an iceberg to come 
floating along and all is lost. However, all is not lost, yet; can you 
take just one small step today? Start by identifying the biggest risk 
and begin to address it. Find the easiest risk to correct and address 
it.
You
 may feel your organization is just waiting for an iceberg to come 
floating along and all is lost. However, all is not lost, yet; can you 
take just one small step today? Start by identifying the biggest risk 
and begin to address it. Find the easiest risk to correct and address 
it. 
Prior
 to the voyage, if the Titanic had adequate equipment and supplies, 
proper testing and training, cautionary warnings heeded and safety plans
 practiced, many lives could have been saved. If the voyage had been 
delayed to extinguish the fire in the coal bunker of the Titanic, the 
great movie may have had a much different ending! 
The
 ISO 9001:2015 standard is only asking you to assess and address those 
things that could sink you and your organization, to ensure a desired 
ending.
ISO 2015 Life Preservers-On Sale Now
Woody Conway, ICH Lead Trainer
RABQSA Certified Lead Auditor
Woody Conway, ICH Lead Trainer
RABQSA Certified Lead Auditor
 
